Архив рубрики: ИП

КИБЕРПРАВО. Интеллектуальная собственность (2020)

Опубликовано автором

Дополнительная литература

  1. Al Harthy K., Al Shuhaimi F., Al Ismaily K. K. J. The upcoming Blockchain adoption in Higher-education: requirements and process // 2019 4TH MEC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND SMART CITY (ICBDSC). , 2019. С. 130–134.
  2. Alnafrah I., Bogdanova E., Maximova T. Text mining as a facilitating tool for deploying blockchain technology in the intellectual property rights system // International Journal of Intellectual Property Management. 2019. Т. 9. № 2. С. 120–135.
  3. Amelin R. и др. Prospects of Blockchain-Based Information Systems for the Protection of Intellectual Property // Digital Transformation and Global Society Communications in Computer and Information Science. / под ред. D. A. Alexandrov и др. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. С. 327–337.
  4. Aristodemou L., Tietze F. The state-of-the-art on Intellectual Property Analytics (IPA): A literature review on artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analysing intellectual property (IP) data // World Patent Information. 2018. Т. 55. С. 37–51.
  5. Barata S., Cunha P. R., Vieira-Pires R. I Rest My Case! The Possibilities and Limitations of Blockchain-Based IP Protection // Conference: International Conference on Information Systems DevelopmentAt: Toulon, France. , 2019.
  6. Barazza S. ‘Let me talk to you’: open standards and the technologies of the future // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2018. Т. 13. № 3. С. 167–168.
  7. Beran I. M. System dynamics modelling and simulating the effects of intellectual capital on economic growth // Croatian Operational Research Review. 2015. Т. 6. № 2. С. 445–457.
  8. Berdik D. и др. A Survey on Blockchain for Information Systems Management and Security // Information Processing & Management. 2021. Т. 58. № 1. С. 102397.
  9. Bhowmik D. и др. The JPEG-blockchain framework for GLAM services IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops // 2018 Ieee International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops. , 2018.
  10. Bodó B., Gervais D., Quintais J. P. Blockchain and smart contracts: the missing link in copyright licensing? // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2018. Т. 26. № 4. С. 311–336.
  11. Bond T., Blair S. Artificial Intelligence & copyright: Section 9(3) or authorship without an author // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2019. Т. 14. № 6. С. 423–423.
  12. Breitinger C., Gipp B. VirtualPatent — Enabling the Traceability of Ideas Shared Online using Decentralized Trusted Timestamping // Everything Changes, Everything Stays the Same? Understanding Information Spaces. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI 2017). , 2017. С. 89–95.
  13. Casino F., Dasaklis T. K., Patsakis C. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues // Telematics and Informatics. 2019. Т. 36. С. 55–81.
  14. Centobelli P. и др. Surfing blockchain wave, or drowning? Shaping the future of distributed ledgers and decentralized technologies // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021. Т. 165. С. 120463.
  15. Chen W. и др. Review on blockchain technology and its application to the simple analysis of intellectual property protection // International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering. 2020. Т. 22. № 4. С. 437–444.
  16. Clark B., McKenzie B. Blockchain and IP Law: A Match Made in Crypto Heaven? [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/ru/2018/01/article_0005.html (дата обращения: 05.03.2021).
  17. Clarke N. S., Jürgens B., Herrero-Solana V. Blockchain patent landscaping: An expert based methodology and search query // World Patent Information. 2020. Т. 61. С. 101964.
  18. Cuccuru P. Beyond bitcoin: an early overview on smart contracts // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2017. Т. 25. № 3. С. 179–195.
  19. Dae-Hee L., 박민주. Application of Blockchain Technologies to Intellectual Property and Their Limitations // Journal of Korea Infomation Law. 2019. Т. 23. № 2. С. 71–105.
  20. Dong X. A method of image privacy protection based on blockchain technology // 2018 International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data and Blockchain (ICCBB). Fuzhou, China: IEEE, 2018. С. 1–4.
  21. Ducrée J. Research – A blockchain of knowledge? // Blockchain: Research and Applications. 2020. Т. 1. № 1. С. 100005.
  22. Efendioglu N., Woitsch R. A Modelling Method for Digital Service Design and Intellectual Property Management Towards Industry 4.0: CAxMan Case Lecture Notes in Computer Science // Serviceology for Services, Icserv 2017 Lecture Notes in Computer Science. / под ред. Y. Hara, D. Karagiannis. , 2017. С. 153–163.
  23. Engelmann F. и др. Intellectual Property Protection and Licensing of 3D Print with Blockchain Technology Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering // Transdisciplinary Engineering Methods for Social Innovation of Industry 4.0 Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering. / под ред. M. Peruzzini и др. , 2018. С. 103–112.
  24. Evans R. D. и др. Yammer: Investigating its Impact on Employee Knowledge Sharing during Product Development. , 2017. 409–414 с.
  25. Felin T., Lakhani K. What problems will you solve with blockchain? // Mit Sloan Management Review. 2018. Т. 60. № 1. С. 32- +.
  26. Feng L. и др. System architecture for high-performance permissioned blockchains // Frontiers of Computer Science. 2019. Т. 13. № 6. С. 1151–1165.
  27. Finck M., Moscon V. Copyright Law on Blockchains: Between New Forms of Rights Administration and Digital Rights Management 2.0 // IIC. 2019. Т. 50. № 1. С. 77–108.
  28. Funk E. и др. Blockchain Technology: A Data Framework to Improve Validity, Trust, and Accountability of Information Exchange in Health Professions Education // ACADEMIC MEDICINE. 2018. Т. 93. № 12. С. 1791–1794.
  29. Gipp B. и др. CryptSubmit: Introducing Securely Timestamped Manuscript Submission and Peer Review Feedback Using the Blockchain // 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL). , 2017. С. 273–276.
  30. Gomes, Sinisterra. Desmystifying patent protection in universities.
  31. Goncharov D. Y., Rychkova N. Y., Slukin S. V. Some Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights Protection in Digital Environment AEBMR-Advances in Economics Business and Management Research // Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Conference Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy: from Regional Development to Global Economic Growth AEBMR-Advances in Economics Business and Management Research. / под ред. A. Nazarov. , 2019. С. 460–462.
  32. Gürkaynak G. и др. Intellectual property law and practice in the blockchain realm // Computer Law & Security Review. 2018. Т. 34. № 4. С. 847–862.
  33. Halloush Z. A., Yaseen Q. M. A blockchain model for preserving intellectual property // Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Data Science, E-Learning and Information Systems DATA ’19. Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. С. 1–5.
  34. Holland M. и др. Intellectual Property Protection of 3D Print Supply Chain with Blockchain Technology International ICE Conference on Engineering Technology and Innovation // 2018 Ieee International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation International ICE Conference on Engineering Technology and Innovation. , 2018.
  35. Holland M., Nigischer C., Stjepandic J. Copyright Protection in Additive Manufacturing with Blockchain Approach Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering // Transdisciplinary Engineering: a Paradigm Shift Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering. / под ред. C. H. Chen и др. , 2017. С. 914–921.
  36. Hörnle J. Juggling more than three balls at once: multilevel jurisdictional challenges in EU Data Protection Regulation // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2019. Т. 27. № 2. С. 142–170.
  37. Ito K., O’Dair M. A Critical Examination of the Application of Blockchain Technology to Intellectual Property Management // Business Transformation through Blockchain: Volume II / под ред. H. Treiblmaier, R. Beck. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. С. 317–335.
  38. Jing N., Liu Q., Sugumaran V. A blockchain-based code copyright management system // Information Processing & Management. 2021. Т. 58. № 3. С. 102518.
  39. Kimani D. и др. Blockchain, business and the fourth industrial revolution: Whence, whither, wherefore and how? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020. Т. 161. С. 120254.
  40. Kiviat T. Beyond Bitcoin: Issues in Regulating Blockchain Transactions // 2015. Т. 65. С. 569–608.
  41. Korneychuk B. V. Political economy of distributed capitalism (On the book by D. Tapscott and A. Tapscott «Blockchain revolution. How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world») // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018. № 3. С. 153–159.
  42. Lamothe A. Factors Influencing the Usage of an Electronic Book Collection: Size of the E-book Collection, the Student Population, and the Faculty Population // College & Research Libraries. 2011. Т. 74. С. 39–59.
  43. Lendzion J. P. Human resources management in the system of organizational knowledge management Procedia Manufacturing // 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Procedia Manufacturing. / под ред. T. Ahram, W. Karwowski, D. Schmorrow. , 2015. С. 674–680.
  44. Lohmer J., Lasch R. Blockchain in operations management and manufacturing: Potential and barriers // Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2020. Т. 149. С. 106789.
  45. Macbeth S., Pitt J. V. Self-organising management of user-generated data and knowledge // Knowledge Engineering Review. 2015. Т. 30. № 3. С. 237–264.
  46. Maesa D. D. F., Mori P. Blockchain 3.0 applications survey // Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing. 2020. Т. 138. С. 99–114.
  47. Malaurie-Vignal M. Blockchain, intellectual property and fashion // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2020. Т. 15. № 2. С. 92–97.
  48. Maresch D., Fink M., Harms R. When patents matter: The impact of competition and patent age on the performance contribution of intellectual property rights protection // Technovation. 2016. Т. 57–58. С. 14–20.
  49. Modic D. и др. Innovations in intellectual property rights management: Their potential benefits and limitations // European Journal of Management and Business Economics. 2019. Т. 28. № 2. С. 189–203.
  50. Mostert F., Wang J. The application and challenges of Blockchain in in lectual property driven businesses in China // Tsinghua China Law Review. 2018. Т. 11. № 1. С. 13–42.
  51. Novoselova L., Grin E. Legal aspects of Blockchain’s technology applicability for registration of intellectual rights MATEC Web of Conferences // International Science Conference Spbwosce-2017 Business Technologies for Sustainable Urban Development MATEC Web of Conferences. / под ред. I. Ilin, O. Kalinina. , 2018.
  52. Paillard G. и др. The ELF Honest Data Broker: informatics enabling public-private collaboration in a precompetitive arena // Drug Discovery Today. 2016. Т. 21. № 1. С. 97–102.
  53. Papakostas N., Newell A., Hargaden V. A novel paradigm for managing the product development process utilising blockchain technology principles // Cirp Annals-Manufacturing Technology. 2019. Т. 68. № 1. С. 137–140.
  54. Pereira J., Tavalaei M. M., Ozalp H. Blockchain-based platforms: Decentralized infrastructures and its boundary conditions // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019. Т. 146. С. 94–102.
  55. Petrescu A. S., Panea O. A research agenda: facilitating global socioeconomic equilibrium through enabling and accelerating natural flows — the case of e-commerce law, bitcoin, and blockchain. , 2017. 617–637 с.
  56. Potts J. и др. A journal is a club: a new economic model for scholarly publishing // Prometheus. 2017. Т. 35. № 1. С. 75–92.
  57. Rahmanzadeh S., Pishvaee M. S., Rasouli M. R. Integrated innovative product design and supply chain tactical planning within a blockchain platform // International Journal of Production Research. 2019.
  58. Rosa J. L. D. L. и др. On Intellectual Property in Online Open Innovation for SME by means of Blockchain and Smart Contracts // 2016.
  59. Rosati E. The year in EU copyright: is the right approach an emotional approach? // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2018. Т. 13. № 12. С. 923–923.
  60. Rust K. Block-chain Reaction: Why Development of Blockchain is at the Heart of the Legal Technology of Tomorrow: Overall Winner, Justis International Writing Competition 2019 by Kimberley Rust of the University of Sheffield // Legal Information Management. 2019. Т. 19. № 1. С. 58–60.
  61. Ruzakova O. A., Grin E. S. Application of blockchain technologies in systematizing the results of intellectual activity = Применение блокчейн-технологий в систематизации результатов интеллектуальной деятельности // Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki. 2017. № 4. С. 508–520.
  62. Sanka A. I. и др. A survey of breakthrough in blockchain technology: Adoptions, applications, challenges and future research // Computer Communications. 2021. Т. 169. С. 179–201.
  63. Schneider M. Intellectual property rights, the new currency // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2019. Т. 14. № 11. С. 825–826.
  64. Schönhals A., Hepp T., Gipp B. Design Thinking using the Blockchain: Enable Traceability of Intellectual Property in Problem-Solving Processes for Open Innovation // Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems CryBlock’18. Munich, Germany: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. С. 105–110.
  65. Song H. и др. Proof-of-Contribution consensus mechanism for blockchain and its application in intellectual property protection // Information Processing & Management. 2021. Т. 58. № 3. С. 102507.
  66. Sun H., Wang X., Wang X. Application of Blockchain Technology in Online Education // International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 2018. Т. 13. № 10. С. 252–259.
  67. Suyambu G. T., Anand M., Janakirani M. Blockchain – A Most Disruptive Technology On The Spotlight Of World Engineering Education Paradigm // Procedia Computer Science. 2020. Т. 172. С. 152–158.
  68. Tapscott D., Euchner J. Blockchain and the Internet of Value // Research-Technology Management. 2019. Т. 62. № 1. С. 12–19.
  69. Team T. B. & B. I. National copyright decisions round-up 2019 // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2020. Т. 15. № 5. С. 332–364.
  70. Vacca A. и др. A systematic literature review of blockchain and smart contract development: Techniques, tools, and open challenges // Journal of Systems and Software. 2021. Т. 174. С. 110891.
  71. Wang J. и др. A Summary of Research on Blockchain in the Field of Intellectual Property // Procedia Computer Science. 2019a. Т. 147. С. 191–197.
  72. Wang J. и др. A Summary of Research on Blockchain in the Field of Intellectual Property Procedia Computer Science // 2018 International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things Procedia Computer Science. / под ред. R. Bie, Y. Sun, J. Yu. , 2019b. С. 191–197.
  73. Welpe A. D. Andranik Tumasjan, and Isabell M. Blockchain Is Changing How Media and Entertainment Companies Compete [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/blockchain-is-changing-how-media-and-entertainment-companies-compete/ (дата обращения: 08.03.2021).
  74. Xu M., Chen X., Kou G. A systematic review of blockchain = Систематический обзор блокчейна // Financ Innov. 2019. Т. 5. № 1. С. 27.
  75. Yakovlev D. и др. Improvement of the course «Management of intellectual property» based on the mixed state contract in the field of scientific R&D Journal of Physics Conference Series // International Conference for Young Scientists, Specialists, and Postgraduates on Nuclear Reactor Physics 2016 Journal of Physics Conference Series. / под ред. A. Smirnov, R. Bahdanovich, E. Proshkina. , 2017.
  76. Yang F. и др. The Survey on Intellectual Property Based on Blockchain Technology // 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber Physical Systems (ICPS). , 2019. С. 743–748.
  77. Yu C. и др. Blockchain-based shared manufacturing in support of cyber physical systems: concept, framework, and operation // Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2020. Т. 64. С. 101931.
  78. Zeilinger M. Digital Art as ‘Monetised Graphics’: Enforcing Intellectual Property on the Blockchain // Philos. Technol. 2018. Т. 31. № 1. С. 15–41.
  79. Zhirnov A. D. Prospects for machine learning and bigdata usage in the economy of intelectual property // Ekonomika. Biznes. Banki. 2017. Т. 4. С. 125–128.

Дополнение:

  1. Ng M. Choice of law for property issues regarding Bitcoin under English law // Journal of Private International Law. 2019. № 2 (15). C. 315–338.
  2. Savelyev A. Contract law 2.0: ‘Smart’ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law // Information & Communications Technology Law. 2017. № 2 (26). C. 116–134.
  3. Janoski-Haehlen E. Robots, Blockchain, ESI, Oh My!: Why Law Schools Are (or Should Be) Teaching Legal Technology // Legal Reference Services Quarterly. 2019. № 3 (38). C. 77–101.
  4. Terrell M., Hand D. The Justis International Law & Technology Writing Competition 2019 // Legal Information Management. 2019. № 1 (19). C. 57–58.

КИБЕРПРАВО. БЛОКЧЕЙН (правовое обеспечение) (2018)

Опубликовано автором

Астанин В.В., Плигин В.Н. Научно-практический диалог о праве и его применении // Мониторинг правоприменения. 2017. № 2 (23). С. 4-12.

Бабкин А.В., Буркальцева Д.Д., Пшеничников В.В., Тюлин А.С. Криптовалюта и блокчейн-технология в цифровой экономике: генезис развития // Научно-технические ведомости Санкт-Петербургского государственного политехнического университета. Экономические науки. 2017. Т. 10. № 5. С. 9-22.

Бертовский Л.В. Технология блокчейна в уголовном процессе как элемент цифрового судопроизводства // Проблемы экономики и юридической практики. 2017. № 6. С. 226-230.

Болотаева О.С. Основные направления правового регулирования систем распределенного реестра в условиях формирования цифровой экономики // Вестник северо-восточного федерального университета им. М.К. Аммосова. Серия: История. Политология. Право. 2017. № 4 (08). С. 68-75.

Борисова О.В. Криптовалюта как средство повышения привлекательности российского бизнеса // Стратегии бизнеса. 2017. № 9 (41). С. 17-21.

Бояркин В. Декомпиляция смарт-контрактов: схема, форма и управление // Zakon.ru – первая социальная сеть для юристов. Электронный ресурс – URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/11/04/dekompilyaciya__ smart-kontraktov_eschyo_odna_statya

Булгаков И. «Умные» контракты и современное договорное право // Zakon.ru – первая социальная сеть для юристов. – Электронный ресурс – URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2016/08/12/umnye_kontrakty_i_ sovremennoe_dogovornoe_pravo

Буряков Г.А., Сотникова А.Д., Велько Е.В. Криптовалюта Эфириум: развитие и перспективы в рамках безопасности финансовых операций // В сборнике: Новые информационные технологии в науке сборник статей по итогам Международной научно-практической конференции. Стерлитамак, 2017. С. 133-137.

Вайпан В.А. Основы правового регулирования цифровой экономики // Право и экономика. 2017. № 11 (357). С. 5-18.

Куляева В. Волнующие изменения цифровой экономики: Почему технология блокчейн может изменить мир? — https://cryptorussia.ru/zametki/volnuyushchie-izmeneniya-cifrovoy-ekonomiki-pochemu-tehnologiya-blokcheyn-mozhet-izmenit-mir

Датиев А.О. Актуальные проблемы правового регулирования предпринимательства в сети Интернет // Отечественная юриспруденция. 2017. Т. 1. № 5 (19). С. 50-53.

Демидов О. В. Связанные одним блокчейном: обзор международного опыта регулирования криптовалют // Индекс безопасности. – 2015. – №2(113). – С. 50- 57.

Дюдикова Е. И. Блокчейн в национальной платежной системе: сущность, понятие и варианты использования // Инновационное развитие экономики. 2016. – №4(34). – С. 139-149.

Закоржевский В.В. Криптовалюты — обзор, принцип работы, текущее использование, правовое регулирование // Глобальные рынки и финансовый инжиниринг. 2016. Т. 3. № 4. С. 281-294.

Заточная А.Д. Правовые аспекты использования цифровых валют: мировой опыт // Евразийская адвокатура. 2017. № 6 (31). С. 112-114.

Зульфугарзаде Т.Э. Особенности правового обеспечения блокчейн-технологий // Экономика. Право. Общество. 2017. № 1 (9). С. 55-62.

Комаров М.А., Прокопьев А.И. Развитие правового симбиоза цифровой и реальной экономики // Ученые труды Российской академии адвокатуры и нотариата. 2017. № 4 (47). С. 113-116.

Кузнецов В.А., Якубов А.В. О подходах в международном регулировании криптовалют (bitcoin) в отдельных иностранных юрисдикциях // Деньги и кредит. 2016. № 3. С. 20-29.

Никитин М.В. Технология блокчейн как инновационный формат партнерства колледжа — образовательного комплекса (ОК) // Профессиональное образование и рынок труда. 2016. № 4. С. 11-17.

О мерах по осуществлению контроля за обращением криптовалют. Письмо ФНС России от 03.10.2016 №ОА-18-17/1027 // Справочно-правовая система «Консультант+». Электронный ресурс. – URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online. cgi?req=doc;base=QUEST;n=162766#0 (дата обращения – 11.11.17).

Об использовании криптовалют. Информационное сообщение Федеральной службы по финансовому мониторингу от 06. 02. 14. – http://base. garant.ru/70587296 (дата обращения – 11.11.17).

Об использовании при совершении сделок «виртуальных валют», в частности, Биткойн. Информация пресс-службы Центрального Банка Российской Федерации (Банка России) от 27.01.14. – https://www.cbr.ru/press/PR/?file=27012014_1825052. htm (дата обращения – 11.11.17)

Парфенова М. Я. Перспективы развития и применения технологии блокчейн // Экологические и природоохранные проблемы современного общества и пути их решения. Материалы XIII междуна- родной научной конференции. – М., 2017. – С. 429-438.

Петухов С.В., Гаврилов Д.А. Блокчейн изменит юридическую практику? Актуальные вопросы В сборнике: Реформирование учета и права в современной России Сборник научных трудов студентов бакалавриата, магистратуры и аспирантуры. Под редакцией В.А. Баранова, А.Н. Приженниковой. Москва, 2018. С. 152-157.

Правовые основы и юридические практики работы с криптовалютой и блокчейн проектами -https://www.rea.ru/ru/org/faculties/11bf052e3fdc11e49ac03cd92b04e0f8/Pages/right.aspx © ФГБОУ ВО «РЭУ им. Г.В. Плеханова»

Распоряжение Правительства РФ от 28.07.2017 №1632-р «Об утверждении программы «Цифровая экономика Российской Федерации» // «Собрание законодательства РФ», 07.08.2017, №32, ст. 5138.

Рашева Н.Ю. Чиркова О.И. Правовые основы электронной валюты (на примере bitcoin) // Управление с современных системах. 2017. 1. С.60-68

Савельев А. И. Научно-практический постатейный комментарий к Федеральному закону «О персональных данных». М. : Статут, 2017.

Савельев А.И. Некоторые правовые аспекты использования смарт-контрактови блокчейн-технологий по российскому праву // Закон. 2017. № 5. С. 94-117.

Святкин В.В., Фёдорова Е.Д. Развитие технологии “blockchain” и влияние на ее развитие правовой культуры // Современные научные исследования и инновации. 2017. № 1 (69). С. 438-439.

Середкина О.А., Сайфулова Л.Г. Блокчейн в праве // В сборнике: Общество в эпоху перемен: формирование новых социально-экономических отношений Материалы международной научно-практической конференции. Ответственный редактор А.А. Зарайский. 2017. С. 96-99.

Сидоренко Э.Л. ICO: криминологические риски и правовые стратегии их преодоления // Вестник Северо-Кавказского гуманитарного института. 2017. № 3. С. 317-320.

Скрылев Д.Д. Основные особенности смарт-контрактов, основанных на технологии blockchain // Economy. Business. Computer science (2017-5) 442-445

Трофименко А.В., Елисеева С.Н., Коробейникова И.С. Цифровая экономика: проблемы повышения эффективности обеспечения прав предпринимателей в киберпространстве // Вестник Саратовского государственного социально-экономического университета. 2017. № 4 (68). С. 73-76.

Кудрин К. Ударить блокчейном по судопроизводству http://провэд.рф/article/45798-udapity-blokcheynom-po-sudoppoizvodstvu.html / 10.01.2018

Указ Президента РФ от 09.05.2017 №203 «О Стратегии развития информационного общества в Российской Федерации на 2017-2030 годы» // «Собрание законодательства РФ», 15.05.2017, №20, ст. 2901.

Фомин А.Н. Криптовалюты в цифровой экономике: финансово-экономические аргументы «за» и «против» Аналитический доклад (37 стр.) АНО «Центр стратегических оценок и прогнозов», www.csef.ru http://csef.ru/media/articles/7770/8861.pdf

Шумейко А.А. Особенности правового статуса криптовалюты «биткоин» в разных странах // В сборнике: Инновационные технологии в экономике как фактор развития современного общества Материалы международной научно-практической конференции. Ответственный редактор А.А. Зарайский. 2017. С. 132-135.

КИБЕРПРАВО. БЛОКЧЕЙН в образовании (2019) (ин.яз)

Опубликовано автором

БЛОКЧЕЙН в образовании
(в формате IEEE)

[1]K. Al Harthy, F. Al Shuhaimi, и K. K. J. Al Ismaily, «The upcoming Blockchain adoption in Higher-education: requirements and process = Предстоящее принятие блокчейна в высшем образовании: требования и процесс», в 2019 4TH MEC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND SMART CITY (ICBDSC), 2019, сс. 130–134.

[2]A. Alammary, S. Alhazmi, M. Almasri, и S. Gillani, «Blockchain-Based Applications in Education: A Systematic Review = Основанные на блокчейне приложения в образовании: систематический обзор», APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, т. 9, вып. 12, июн. 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9122400.

[3]G. Albeanu, «Blockchain technology and education = Блокчейн технологии и образование», в PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL LEARNING, ICVL 2017, 2017, сс. 271–275.

Читать далее →

КИБЕРПРАВО. Дополнительная литература на русском языке (2020)

Опубликовано автором

Киберправо. Дополнительная литература на русском языке (2020)

  1. Аббасова Е.В., Васильев В.А. Трудовое право в цифровой реальности: проблемы интеграции // Российская юстиция. 2019. № 4. С. 16–18.
  2. Абрамов С.Г. Конституционные основы правового регулирования предпринимательской деятельности (исследование объекта правового регулирования деятельности искусственного интеллекта) // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. 2019. № 2. С. 51–58.
  3. Аверинская С.А., Севостьянова А.А. Создание искусственного интеллекта с целью злонамеренного использования в уголовном праве Российской Федерации // Закон и право. 2019. № 2. С. 94–96.
  4. Аверкин А.Н., Гаазе-Рапопорт М.Г., Поспелов Д.А. Толковый словарь по искусственному Читать далее →

КИБЕРПРАВО. Дополнительная литература на иностранных языках (2020)

Опубликовано автором
  1. Abbott R. The Reasonable Robot: Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Cambridge University Press. 2020.
  2. Ajunwa I. Algorithms at work: productivity monitoring applications and wearable technology as the new data-centric research agenda for employment and labor law. Saint Louis university law journal. 2019.
  3. Amoretti F. Electronic Constitution: Social, Cultural, and Political Implications. London: Information Science Reference. 2009. 310 p.
  4. Anagnostopoulos A., Castillo C., Fazzone A., Leonardi S., Terzi E. Algorithms for Hiring and Outsourcing in the Online Labor Market / KDD ’18 Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. New York. 2018. P. 1109–1118.
  5. Ashford N.A., Hall R.P. The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2011. No 3. P. 270–292.
  6. Ashley K.D. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge University Press. 2017. 450 p.
  7. Ashley K.D. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. 1990. 329 p.
  8. Balkin J.M. The Path of Robotics Law. California Law Review Circuit. 2015. Vol. 6. P. 45–60.
  9. Barfield W., Williams A. Law, Cyborgs, and Technologically Enhanced Brains. Philosophies. 2017. Vol. 2. No 6.
  10. Barr A., Cohen P.R., Feigenbaum E.A. The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. 1st ed. Stanford University: HeurisTech Press. 1981. 397 p.
  11. Barraud B. Le coup de data permanent: la loi des algorithmes. 2017.
  12. Benhamou S., Janin L. Intelligence artificielle et travail. Rapport à la ministre du travail et au secrétaire d’État auprès du Premier ministre, chargé du numérique. 2018.
  13. Bensoussan A., Bensoussan J. Droit des robots. Bruxelles: Larcier. 2015. 168 p.
  14. Berman P.S. Cyberspace and the State Action Debate: The Cultural Value of Applying Constitutional Norms to “Private” Regulation. University of Colorado Law Review. 2000. Vol. 71. P. 1263–1310.
  15. Birgillito G., Birgillito M. Algorithms and ratings: tools to manage la-bour relations. Proposals to renegotiate labour conditions for platform drivers. Labour & Law Issues. 2018. Vol. 4. No 2. P. 25–50.
  16. Bridgers A. Will workplaces be going off the rails on the blockchain?
  17. Brozek B., Jakubiec M. On the legal responsibility of autonomous ma-chines. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2017. Vol. 25. Iss. 3. P. 293–304.
  18. Bryson J.J., Diamantis M.E., Grant T.D. Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2017. Vol. 25. Iss. 3. P. 273–291.
  19. Buchanan B.G., Headrick T.E. Some Speculation About Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning // Stanford Law Review. 1970. Vol. 23. No 1. P. 40–62.
  20. Buiten M.C. Towards Intelligent Regulation of Artificial Intelligence // European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2019. No 10. P. 41–59.
  21. Calo R., Froomkin A.M., Kerr I. Robot Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2016. 424 p.
  22. Casilli A. En attendant les robots: enquête sur le travail du clic. Paris: Editions du Seuil. 2019. 400 p.
  23. Casilli A., Posada J. The Platformization of Labor and Society. In MGraham & WHDutton (ed.), Society and the Internet; How Networks of In-formation and Communication are Changing Our Lives. 2nd edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2019. P. 293–306.
  24. Cath C. Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2018. P. 376.
  25. Celeste E. Digital Constitutionalism: Mapping the Constitutional Response to Digital Technology’s Challenges. HIIG Discussion Paper Series. 2018. No 2.
  26. Celeste E. Terms of Service and Bills of Rights: New Mechanisms of Constitutionalisation in the Social Media Environment? International Review of Law, Computer and Technology. 2019. Vol. 33. No 2. P. 122–138.
  27. Chae Y. U.S. AI Regulation Guide: Legislative Overview and Practical Considerations // Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law. 2020. Vol. 3. No 1. P. 17–40.
  28. Cheatham B., K. Javanmardian B., Samandari H. Confronting the risks of artificial intelligence. April 2019.
  29. Chéronnet A., Giraux M. Analyse algorithmique des données judiciaires : de l’aide à la décision à la justice prédictive. 18 october 2017.
  30. Cherry M.A. The Gamification of Work. Hofstra Law Review. 2012. Vol. 40. P. 851–858.
  31. Chesalina O. Access to social security for digital platform workers in Germany and in Russia: a comparative study. Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal. 2018. Vol. 7. No 1–2. P. 17–28.
  32. Choudary S.P. The architecture of digital labour platforms: Policy recommendations on platform design for worker well-being. ILO future of work research paper series. Geneva: ILO. 2018. 55 р.
  33. Christensen C.M. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 1997. 228 p.
  34. Ciampi C. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Information Systems. Vol. I: Edited Versions of Selected Papers from the International Conference on “Logic, Informatics, Law”. Florence, Italy. April 1981. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 1982. 476 p.
  35. Clausen J., Fetz E., Donoghue J., Ushiba J., Spörhase U. et al. Help, hope, and hype: Ethical dimensions of neuroprosthetics. Science. 2017. Vol. 356. Iss. 6345. P. 1338–1339.
  36. Dabosville B. Protection of Employees Personal Information and Privacy in France. Protection of Employees’ Personal Information and Privacy. Tokyo: The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training. 2014. Report No 14. P. 31–48.
  37. Dachs B. The impact of new technologies on the labour market and the social economy. Study. European Parliamentary research service. Brussels. February 2018. 64 p.
  38. Davidov G. The Status of Uber Drivers: A Purposive Approach. Span-ish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal. 2017. No 6. P. 6–15.
  39. De Stefano V. “Negotiating the Algorithm”: Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Labour Protection. ILO Employment Working Paper. Geneva: ILO. 2018. No 246. 38 p.
  40. De Stefano V., Aloisi A. Fundamental labour rights, platform work and human-rights protection of non-standard workers. Bocconi legal studies research paper series. 2018. No 1. 23 p.
  41. De Vos M. Work 4.0 and the future of labour law. SSRN Electronic Journal. January 2018.
  42. Dibbell J. Invisible Labor, Invisible Play: Online Gold Farming and the Boundary Between Jobs and Games. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law. 2016. Vol. 18. No 3. P. 419–465.
  43. Ducorps-Prouvost E. Le droit du travail face aux enjeux de l’intelligence artificielle: tome 1 d’une trilogie. 2018.
  44. Eidenmueller H. The Rise of Robots and the Law of Humans. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper. 2017. No 27. 15 p.
  45. Erdelyi O.J., Goldsmith J. Regulating Artificial Intelligence Proposal for a Global Solution. 2018.
  46. Ernst E., Merola R., Samaan D. The economics of artificial intelligence: implications for the future of work. Geneva: ILO. 2018. 41 р.
  47. Estlund C. What Should We Do after Work? Automation and Employment Law. Yale Law Journal. 2018. Vol. 128. No 2. P. 254–326.
  48. Eun-jin K. Korean Government to Repeal Regulations in AI Industry December 18, 2019.
  49. Fitzgerald B. Software as Discourse? A Constitutionalism for Information Society. Alternative Law Journal. 1999. Vol. 24. No 3.
  50. Flaspöler E., Reinert D. Expert forecast on emerging physical risks related to occupational safety and health. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Belgium. 2005. 82 р.
  51. Foerst A. Artificial sociability: from embodied AI toward new understandings of personhood // Technology in Society. 1999. Vol. 21. Iss. 4. P. 373–386.
  52. Ford M. Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York. Basic Books. 2015. 81 p.
  53. Frank A. How artificial intelligence will impact the future of work. Simpler Media Group. 2018.
  54. Frey C.B., Osborne M.A. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Elsevier. 2017. Vol. 114. Р. 254–280.
  55. Gill L., Redeker D., Gasser U. Towards Digital Constitutionalism? Mapping Attempts to Craft an Interne t Bill of Rights. Berkman Center Re-search Publication. 2015. No 15.
  56. Gürkaynak G., Yılmaz I., Doygun T., İnce E. Questions of intellectual property in the artificial intelligence realm. Robotics Law Journal. 2017. September-October. P. 9–11.
  57. Hallevy G. When Robots Kill: Artificial Intelligence under Criminal Law. University Press of New England. 2013. С. 177–178.
  58. Hamzelou J. Brain implant boosts human memory by mimicking how we learn. New Scientist. 13 November 2017.
  59. Harari Yu.N. Homo Deus: a brief history of tomorrow. Harvill Secker. 2015. 448 p.
  60. Harris S.D., Krueger A.B. A Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First-Century Work: The “Independent Worker”. The Hamilton Project. Discussion Paper. December 2015. 40 р.
  61. Hernæs Ch.O. Artificial Intelligence, Legal Responsibility and Civil Rights. 22 Aug 2015.
  62. Joerges Ch., Sand I.-J., Teubner G. Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 2004. 408 p.
  63. Kennedy E.J. Employed by an algorithm: labor rights in the on-demand economy. Seattle UL Review. 2016. Vol. 40. P. 987–1048.
  64. Kim T.W. Gamification of Labor and the Charge of Exploitation. Jour-nal of Business Ethics. 2018. Vol. 152. Iss. 1. P. 27–39.
  65. Koops E.-J., Di Carlo A., Nocco L., Casamassima V., Stradella E. Robotic Technologies and Fundamental Rights: Robotics Challenging the European Constitutional Framework // International Journal of Technoethics. Vol. 4. 2013. No 2. P. 1198–1219.
  66. Krasadakis G. Artificial intelligence: the impact on employment and the workforce. 2018.
  67. La Raudière L. de. La fabrique de la loi à l’ère du numérique. Enjeux numériques. 2018. No 3. P. 73–76.
  68. Maia A.F. The Legal Status of Artificially Intelligent Robots: Personhood, Taxation and Control. 1 June 2017.
  69. Markou Ch. The Conflict of Law and Technology: A Systems Theory of Arificial Intelligence Regulation. The University of Cambridge. Faculty of Law.
  70. McCarty L.T. Finding the Right Balance in Artificial Intelligence and Law. In book: Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence. Chapter: 3. Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2017. P.55–87.
  71. McCarty L.T. Reflections on “Taxman”: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning // Harvard Law Review 1977. Vol. 90. P. 837–893.
  72. Mercader Uguina J.R., Muñoz Ruiz A.B. Robotics and Health and Safety at Work. International Journal of Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation. 2019. Vol. 8 Iss. 1.
  73. Moore Ph.V. Artificial Intelligence: Occupational Safety and Health and the Future of Work. 2018.
  74. Moore Ph.V. The Threat of Physical and Psychosocial Violence and Harassment in Digitalized Work. International Labour Office. Geneva. 2018. 52 р.
  75. Moravec H.P. Mind children. The future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988. 224 p.
  76. Morris G. Protection of Employees Personal Information and Privacy in English Law. Protection of Employees’ Personal Information and Privacy. Tokyo: The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training. 2014. Report No 14. P. 71–92.
  77. Murphy B.J. Do robots deserve the right to Unionize?
  78. Nagele-Piazza L. How is artificial intelligence changing the workplace? Society for human resource management, November 2018.
  79. Nemitz P. Constitutional Democracy and Technology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 18 August 2018.
  80. Nevejans N. Règles européennes de droit civil en robotique. Étude. Bruxelles : Departement thematique C : Droits des citoyens et affaires constitutionnelles. 2016.
  81. Nevejans N. Traité de Droit et d’éthique de la robotique civile. Bordeaux: LEH Édition. 2017. 1230 p.
  82. Oswalt M.M., Rosado Marzán C.F. Organizing the State: The “New Labor Law” Seen from the Bottom-Up. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law. 2018. Vol. 39. Iss. 2. P. 415–480.
  83. Pagallo U. The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts (Law, Governance and Technology Series). Springer Science & Business Media. 2013. 181 p.
  84. Parker C.B. Artificial intelligence will both disrupt and benefit the workplace, Stanford scholar says. Stanford News. 2018.
  85. Pasquale F.A. A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation. Washington Law Review. 2019 Vol. 87 No 1.
  86. Petit N. Law and Regulation of Artificial Intelligence and Robots – Conceptual Framework and Normative Implications.
  87. Pinna A., Ibba S. A blockchain-based decentralized system for proper handling of temporary employment contracts. November 2017.
  88. Pizzoferrato A. Platform Workers in the Italian Legal System. Italian Labour Law e-Journal. 2019. Issue 1. Vol. 12.
  89. Portuné R. Psychosocial Risks in the Workplace: An Increasing Challenge for German and International Health Protection. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 2012. Vol. 63. No 2. P. 123–131.
  90. Prassl J., Risak M. Uber, taskrabbit, and co.: Platforms as employers-rethinking the legal analysis of crowdwork. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper. 2015. Vol. 37. P. 619–650.
  91. Pretelli I. Conflict of laws in the maze of digital platforms / Le droit international privé dans le labyrinthe des plateformes digitales. Schulthess. 2019. 343 p.
  92. Redeker D., Gill L., Gasser U. Towards Digital Constitutionalism? Mapping Attempts to Craft an Internet Bill of Rights. International Communication Gazette. Vol. 80. 2018. No 4. P. 302–319.
  93. Rissland E.L. Artificial Intelligence and Law: Stepping Stones to a Model of Legal Reasoning // Yale Law Journal. 1990. Vol. 99. No 8. P. 1957–1981.
  94. Rosen J., Wittes B. Constitution 3.0: Freedom and Technological Change. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. 2011. 271 p.
  95. Rosenblat A. Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. 1st ed. Oakland, California: University of California Press. 2018. 296 p.
  96. Sales É. La transformation de l’écriture de la Constitution, l’exemple islandais. Dans Les Nouveaux Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel. 2017. Vol. 57. No 4. P. 45–57.
  97. Scherer M.U. Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies // Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 2016. Vol. 29. Nо 2. P. 353–400.
  98. Scholten C., Barneveld, Van J., Henshaw M., Tapus A., Vanderborght B. etc. Scientific Foresight study. Ethical Aspects of Cyber-Physical Systems. Strasbourg: European Parliamentary Research Service. European Parliament. 2016. 130 p.
  99. Seghezzi F., Tiraboschi M. Italy’s Industry 4.0 Plan: An Analysis from a Labour Law Perspective. E-Journal of International and Comparative La-bour Studies. 2018. Vol. 7. No 1. 39 р.
  100. Simonite T. Algorithms that Learn with Less Data Could Expand AI’s Power. MIT Technology Review. May 2016.
  101. Smuhaa N.A. From a “Race to AI” to a “Race to AI Regulation”: Regulatory Competition for Artificial Intelligence. Working Paper. 2019.
  102. Solaiman S.M. Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2017. Vol. 25. Iss. 2. P. 155–179.
  103. Solum L.B. Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Caro-lina Law Review. 1992. Vol. 70. No 4. P. 1231–1287.
  104. Southwell A.H., Vandevelde E.D., Walther M. 2019 Artificial Intelligence and Automated Systems Annual Legal Review. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. 2020. 45 p.
  105. Stacey N., Ellwood P., Bradbrook S., Reynolds J., Williams H., Lye D. Foresight on new and emerging occupational safety and health risks associated with digitalisation by 2025. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2018. 159 р.
  106. Stone P. et al. Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030. One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015–2016. Stanford. Stanford University. 2016. 52 p.
  107. Streel A. de, Jacquemin H. L’intelligence artificielle et le droit. Larcier. 2017. 482 p.
  108. Sullivan Ch.A. Employing AI. Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper. February 2018.
  109. Susskind R.E. Expert systems in law: a jurisprudential approach to artificial intelligence and legal reasoning // Modern Law Review. 1986. Vol. 49. Iss. 2. P. 168–194.
  110. Suteu S. Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era: Lessons from Iceland and Ireland. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review. 2015. Vol. 38. No 2. P. 251–276.
  111. Suzor N. Digital Constitutionalism and the Role of the Rule of Law in the Governance of Virtual Communities. PhD Thesis, Queensland University of Technology. 2010.
  112. Teubner G. Constitutional Fragments. Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford Scholarship Online. 2012.
  113. Thüsing G. Data Protection in the Employment Relationship. The German View. Protection of Employees’ Personal Information and Privacy. Tokyo: The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training. 2014. Report No 14. P. 5–30.
  114. Todolí-Signes A. Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decisions about Workers and the Risks of Discrimination: The Necessary Col-lective Governance of Data Protection. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2018.
  115. Tubaro P., Casilli A. Micro-work, artificial intelligence and the auto-motive industry. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. 2019.
  116. Turner J. Robot Rules. Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Palgrave Macmillan. 2019.
  117. Valenduc G., Vendramin P. The Mirage of the End of Work. Brussels: ETUI. March 2019. 16 p.
  118. Vallas S.P., Kovalainen A. Work and Labor in the Digital Age. Emer-ald Publishing Limited. 2019. Vol. 33. 208 p.
  119. Vercamer S. Stress at work. Report. Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development. 4 December 2018.
  120. Villani C. «Donner un sens à l’intelligence artificielle». Paris: Direction de l’information légale et administrative. 2018. 233 p.
  121. Villani C. Donner un sens à l’intelligence artificielle. Paris: Direction de l’information légale et administrative. 2018. 233 p.
  122. Volkova I.I. Four pillars of gamification. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research. 2013. Т. 13. P. 149–152.
  123. Walker J. Researchers shut down AI that invented its own language. 21 July 2017.
  124. Weng Y-H. et al. Intersection of “Tokku” special zone, robots, and the law: a case study on legal impacts to humanoid robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. 2015. Vol. 7. Iss. 5. P. 841–857.
  125. Wickers Th. L’intelligence artificielle et la justice. Les applications possibles et le cadre de déploiement // Cahiers de droit de l’entreprise. 2019. No 4. P. 33–36.
  126. Wisskirchen G. Artificial intelligence and the workplace. ABA Inter-national labor and employment law committee midyear meeting. 2018.
  127. Wisskirchen G., Biacabe B.Th., Bormann U. and etc. Artificial intel-ligence and robotics and their impact on the workplace. IBA Global Employment Institute. 2017.
  128. Wixted F., Shevlin M., O’Sullivan L.W. Distress and worry as mediators in the relationship between psychosocial risks and upper body musculoskeletal complaints in highly automated manufacturing. 15 March 2018.
  129. Xavier B. Chapitre 7. Vers un statut juridique des androïdes ? Journal International de Bioéthique. 2013. Vol. 24. No 4. P. 85–98.
  130. Yadong C. Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Modernization. Springer. 2020. 224 p.
  131. Yan S. Artificial intelligence will replace half of all jobs in the next decade, says widely followed technologist. 27 April 2017.
  132. You S., Robert L.P. Human–Robot Similarity and Willingness to Work with a Robotic Coworker. HRI ’18 Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 2018. P. 251–260.
  133. Yukdowsky E. Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk. Global Catastrophic Risks. New York: Oxford University Press. 2008. 46 p.
  134. Zogg B. L’Europe et la course à l’Intelligence Artificielle // Politique de sécurité: analyses du CSS. 2019. No 247. P. 1–4.